skill tutorial · scenario
Theory that comes with a lab
Reading about the Kirkpatrick model and running a Kirkpatrick Level-2 measure are different senses of the same phrase. The folders here make theory executable; AssessWiki makes it citable. An agent holding both turns studying into: read the claim, run the artifact, check the delta.
The library, arranged by theory
Each activity folder is a theory made printable. The pair you want on first name:
theory -> folder -> deep reference
Kirkpatrick levels -> training-evaluation-form -> assesswiki.com (L1-L4 hubs) Debrief design -> run-a-debrief guide + any debrief.md Pre/post measurement -> any assessment-type folder -> pre-post-measures guide Psychometric safety -> trust-exercises guide -> AssessWiki measurement pages Design for 90 minutes -> design-a-workshop guide -> catalog.json as component bin
Study pattern with an agent
a loop that teaches
1. Ask the agent to match a concept to a folder: "which installed skill demonstrates pair-level deltas?" 2. Read the theory page it links (assesswiki.com, or the site's own guides under guides/). 3. Run the folder's prep — the artifact makes the concept concrete. 4. Debrief the activity on yourself with its own debrief file: the questions are the theory, applied.
Why cited theory, not model memory
Agents summarize Kirkpatrick from weights — fluently, and occasionally wrong about what Level 4 claims. The site links every contested claim to a written source: the AssessWiki hubs carry the definitions, limits and citations; the folder carries the implementation. Your study notes inherit both.
For trainers who must document learning
If the theory reading feeds a quality system — TTQS course documentation, QF-style records — the paperwork guide on this site says exactly which evaluation evidence such systems expect, and which folder produces it.
keep going
questions
Can an agent teach facilitation from these files alone?
For the concepts with artifacts attached — yes, in the lab sense: it can explain, demo, and grade your own run against the debrief's criteria. Rooms and mentors remain the other half.
Is AssessWiki free?
Yes — free reference hubs with sources, no account. Read-only pages; the tools it describes (like FormLM) have their own terms.
Which guide should I start with?
design-a-workshop for structure, run-a-debrief for the hard part, pre-post-measures for evidence.